The purpose of the present
article will be to present certain aspects of the sociolinguistic
situation among one of the least studied ethnic groups in the Middle
East, the Baloch, who inhabit the south-eastern corner of the Iranian
linguistic area. It is an area where the dominance of the state is
relatively recent, and where modern society with a monetary economy, a
settled lifestyle, mass education, state administration etc. is just
being established.
It is particularly interesting to study
language-related decisions of the state, and the implementation of these
decisions in a region like Balochistan, where until recently there were
no such phenomena as e.g. language planning, education, mass media,
newspapers or administrative language. However, in Iran the Persian
language and in Pakistan Urdu and English have started to play a
constantly growing role in Balochistan, something which is by many
Baloch felt as a threat to both their language and their distinct ethnic
identity. It must be stressed that modernity is not regarded as
negative, but the Baloch intellectuals face the dilemma of how to retain
their ethnic and linguistic diversity at the same time as they seek
active participation in an increasingly globalised world.
The Historical Background
The
border between Iran and Pakistan, which cuts through the traditional
land of the Baloch, has since the time of its demarcation in the late
nineteenth century been constantly questioned and frequently ignored by
the Baloch living on both sides of it. It is called the Goldsmid line,
and was drawn by a border commission headed by the British general
Goldsmid, which also held representatives from Tehran and the Balochi
Khanate of Kalat (see below) (Breseeg 2001: 133-134, Hosseinbor 2000:
73-80). However, it has had a considerable impact on linguistic issues,
and it is therefore interesting to study the position of Balochi on
both sides of this border.
There is very little known about the early
history of the Baloch, but two main theories prevail as to when they
arrived in their present habitat, which includes south-eastern Iran,
south-western Pakistan and southern Afghanistan. The ‘native theory’
argues that the core of the Baloch settled in Balochistan and mixed with
other local peoples as early as 2000 years ago, as a continued movement
of the Aryan tribes that had already invaded the Iranian plateau from
the north. The ‘migration theory’, supported by the indigenous epic
tradition as related in the epic poetry on genealogies and the
wanderings of the Baloch tribes, suggests that the Baloch arrived in
Balochistan from the north-west considerably more recently, some time
around the tenth century A.D.
In fact, the ballads suggest a Semitic
origin for the Baloch and a close relation to the prophet Muhammed. This
could, however, be seen as a pseudo-historic way of legitimising the
Baloch as good and orthodox Muslims. Other origins, such as Turkic or
Indian, have also been suggested for the Baloch (Dames 1904: 7). It may
well be that the Baloch earlier in their history were ‘a series of
tribal communities not sharing any feelings of common ethnicity’
(Spooner 1989: 607), and that even though linguistic evidence suggests
the likelihood that at least a core group were of Indo-European origin
who had migrated from the north-west, ‘Arab groups could have found
their way into the heterogeneous tribal population that eventually
assimilated Baluch identity east of Kerman’ (Spooner 1989: 609). Arab
historians from the ninth and tenth centuries A.D. associate them with
the area between Kerman, Khorasan, Sistan and Makran (Spooner 1989:
606). It is also possible that they assimilated a major part of the
local inhabitants in Balochistan when they settled there.
It is not
possible to talk about ‘a Baloch race’ (cf. Dames 1904) in order to
distinguish them from neighbouring peoples, but there are other factors
which bind them together and separate them from others in the region.
Anthony D. Smith (1986: 21) finds that the term ethnos ‘would appear to
be more suited to cultural rather than biological or kinship
differences’. Among such cultural differences, he enumerates ‘a
collective name’, ‘a common myth of descent’, ‘a shared history’, ‘a
distinctive shared culture’, ‘an association with a specific territory’
and ‘a sense of solidarity’ as crucial components of ethnic affiliation
(Smith 1986: 22-31). All these factors are applicable in the case of the
Baloch. Among the components of a shared culture, those of language and
religion are particularly important, and the Balochi language as well
as the Sunni creed are distinguishing factors in relation to
neighbouring ethnic groups.
It is important to be able to
distinguish the ‘self-group’ from other surrounding ethnic groups. In
fact, it is only in an interactive relation to other groups that are
perceived as different that a delimitation of the ‘own-group’ versus the
others becomes meaningful (see e.g. Eriksen 1993). In Iran the Sunni
creed is crucial in that respect, since the Balochi language is closely
related to Persian and is normally in the official discourse described
as a ‘dialect’ (guyeš) of the Persian language (zabān), whereas the
majority in Iran, contrary to most Baloch, profess Shi’a Islam. In
Pakistan, on the other hand, the language, which is not closely related
to Sindhi, Lahnda, Punjabi, Urdu or other Indian languages and very
distinct from the eastern Iranian language Pashto, is more crucial,
since the majority of the Muslims in Pakistan, including a vast majority
of the Baloch, profess Sunni Islam.
The traditional
socio-economic systems in Balochistan divide the land into a northern
part and a southern part. In the north, pastoral nomadism has been the
predominant lifestyle, whereas in the south agriculture, with few
landowners and landless workers or slaves, has been more common. The
tribal structure has, however, historically been a uniting factor among
free-born Baloch in all Balochistan, and it has been easy for originally
non-Baloch tribes and clans to associate with and incorporate
themselves into the Balochi tribal system. Nowadays the
de-tribalisation process is strong, especially in those parts of
Balochistan where the traditional economy is based on settled
agriculture rather than on pastoral nomadism. Tribal loyalties are also
often felt to hamper a strong nationalist movement, and many
intellectual Baloch nowadays try to propagate the replacement of tribal
(sub-national) loyalties with loyalty to the entire Balochi ethnie (see
Smith 1986: 21).
In the seventeenth century the Baloch allied
themselves with another tribal people, the Brahuis, against other
forces in the region, and this Balochi-Brahui Khanate, with its centre
in Kalat (in present-day Pakistan) continued to exist until 1947. It was
especially powerful during the second half of the eighteenth century,
under Nasir Khan I, who ‘was the only khan who successfully transcended
tribal loyalties’ (Spooner 1989: 611), but it was later weakened and
incorporated into the British administration in 1839. The language of
administration in Kalat was from the beginning Persian (Baloch 1987:
120), but English later replaced Persian for official purposes.
In
the nineteenth century the Qajar shahs, ruling from Tehran, made several
attempts to subdue the western parts of Balochistan. Likewise, British
India had intentions of expanding westwards in Balochistan. This is the
background of the Goldsmid border commission, and the demarcation that
resulted from it divided most of the Balochi mainland between British
India and Iran. Even so, the Qajars never succeeded in establishing
their power in Balochistan, and it was only in 1928 that the newly
established Pahlavi monarchy was successful in imposing direct control
over the province.
No comments:
Post a Comment